Congress
and the H-1B Visa Program: An Uncertain Commitment
The September 11th terrorist attack on the United States
has shifted Congressional debate on Immigration, and endangered prospects
for an expansion of the H-1B visa program. Created to address American
companies' growing need for information technology workers, the H-1B visa
allows immigrants with information technology skills to seek employment
and reside in the United States. In 1990, a cap on H-1B entrants limited
immigration to 65,000 people a year.
Industry groups such as the Information Technology Industry Council and
think tanks such as the Cato
Institute have insisted that the caps must either be raised or entirely
abolished to maintain economic growth. Citing low unemployment rates among
such professions as engineering and computer science, these groups aggressively
support the H-1B visa program as a necessity for high-tech health, and
as a source of labor that does not hurt American workers.
Groups supporting such websites as the "H-1B Hall of
Shame", paint a different picture. Claiming that H-1B stories are
censored by the media, such organizations opposed to the H-1B visa program
attempt to point out some of its alleged ills. Opponents of immigration
through the H-1B visa say that there are plenty of Americans to fill information
technology jobs and that the program is an attempt to import cheap labor.
Further, these groups claim that many of the benefits promised to these
immigrants are unfulfilled when they begin employment.
Recent legislation expanded the 1990 cap, attempting to
fill high demand for high-tech workers in such sectors as computer science,
engineering, and systems management. However, in legislation before the
turn of the century, Congress has balanced such needs with legislation
demanding consideration of American workers for such information technology
jobs. On May 21, 1998, the U.S. Senate passed The American Competitiveness
Act (S. 1723), which increased the cap on H-1B visa entrants to 115,000
in 1999, 115,000 in 2000, and 107,500 in 2001. For the fiscal years 2002
and beyond, the cap would be restored to previous levels of 65,000. The
legislation balances this cap increase with provisions protecting Aagainst
displacement of United States workers.
This legislation was followed by a bill enacted in 2000,
entitled The American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000
(S. 2045), which responded to increased demand for high tech labor by
further increasing the caps to 195,000 yearly for 2001 through 2003. It
further exempted visa status for those immigrants previously employed
by academic institutions. Industry groups lauded this legislation as a
significant step to continued economic prosperity, while opposition feared
that immigrants were displacing qualified Americans.
After the September 11 tragedy, views in Congress concerning
immigration soured, and many called for strict border controls. Rep. Tancredo
(R B CO) has been one of the most vocal skeptics of immigration in the
127th Congress. Although bills relating to H-1B visas have yet been introduced
in the current session of Congress, fallout from the September 11th tragedy
seems to have provided justification among some circles on Capitol Hill
for a general tightening of our borders. In fact, Rep, Tancredo chairs
the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, which notes on its website
that "With the events of Sept. 11th, in the second session of the
107th Congress, the caucus will no doubt continue to establish the link
between open borders, unregulated immigration and the potential for terrorism.
In addition, the caucus will push for legislative proposals which will
help secure America's borders, including the creation of a comprehensive
visa tracking system such as H.R. 3525."
This strict control and skepticism concerning immigration
extends to H-1B visa proposals. A February 4, 2002 article by Informationweek.com
had this to say about Tancredo's views: "He's introduced a bill to
roll back the number of H-1B visas granted each year to the 1997 level
of 65,000YTancredo says he's "absolutely opposed" to the visas:
"I was never convinced of organizations' claims of a great need for
people with particular skills." As Congress readies for the 2002
midterm elections, the fate of the H-1B program hangs in the balance.
Related Links:
Check out VisaPortal.com - our
new U.S. immigration web portal dedicated to bringing more transparency, justice
and accountability to U.S. immigration and providing information and other
resources to immigrants and other interested parties.
|
|
|